Zety vs Vitae
Vitae is the better choice if you want fast JD‑specific tweaks and ATS‑first formatting without subscription creep. Zety offers polished templates and guidance, but its visuals can be heavier and manual tailoring takes longer.
- Who it’s for: job seekers who want ATS‑safe resumes, quick JD tailoring, transparent $1/$3 pricing; non‑native English writers.
- Who it’s not for: users who want highly designed, graphic‑heavy templates over ATS reliability.
Try Vitae — Free for first 20 users · Pricing · FAQ
Table of contents
- Verdict
- At‑a‑glance comparison
- Pros and cons
- Real‑world pain points
- How we tested
- Hands‑on walkthrough
- Migration mini‑guide
- Alternatives
- FAQ
- Sources
- Final verdict
Quick verdict
If your priority is an ATS‑safe resume tailored to a specific job in minutes, choose Vitae. If you want design‑forward templates and don’t mind more manual edits or subscriptions, Zety can work.
At‑a‑glance comparison
| Feature | Zety | Vitae |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Typically ~$15–$25/mo (varies by plan) | $1/mo (1 profile) · $3/mo (5 profiles). Free first 20 users |
| ATS compatibility | Mixed depending on template complexity | ATS‑first by default (single‑column, semantic headings) |
| Downloads | Paywalled tiers; PDF/DOCX | PDF/DOCX/MD included |
| JD tailoring | Guided, but largely manual edits | Guided JD tailoring in minutes |
| Non‑native English support | General tips | Plain‑English assistants and tone options |
| Cancellation | Subscription model | Cancel anytime micro‑pricing |
| Best for | Polished, designed templates | Fast, ATS‑safe, JD‑specific content |
Pros and cons
Zety
- Pros
- Polished guided flows for content assembly
- Large template library
- Examples for different roles
- Cons
- Subscription fatigue and upsells
- Some templates risk ATS parsing issues
- Time‑consuming tailoring for each JD
Vitae
- Pros
- ATS‑first structure by default
- JD tailoring flow that takes minutes
- Transparent micro‑pricing ($1/$3) and free cohort
- Cons
- MVP feel; fewer visual themes
- Early product; occasional rough edges
- Focuses on clarity over heavy design
What people dislike about Zety (aggregated themes)
- Unexpected paywalls or confusing download rules
- Hard‑to‑cancel subscriptions
- Pretty templates that don’t always parse cleanly in ATS
- Manual, repetitive tailoring to each posting
See “Sources” for references.
How we tested / methodology
- ATS parsing: headed sections, single‑column layout, bullet/text fidelity
- Customization speed: time from JD paste → tailored bullets
- Pricing transparency: full monthly cost, cancellation clarity
- Export formats: PDF/DOCX and any restrictions
- Non‑native support: clarity of copy helpers, tone guides
Hands‑on walkthrough (Vitae)
- Paste the job description
- Select your profile → Vitae highlights keyword gaps
- Accept suggested bullet rewrites and summary tweaks
- Run ATS checks (headings, bullets, dates, links)
- Export PDF/DOCX/MD
[Screenshots here: JD → suggestions → ATS checks → export]
Migration mini‑guide (Zety → Vitae)
- Pre‑flight: Export your latest Zety resume as DOCX.
- Step 1: Import DOCX into Vitae (Create → Import).
- Step 2: Resolve ATS warnings (headings, icons, spacing).
- Step 3: Paste JD → accept suggested bullet and summary changes.
- Step 4: Export PDF/DOCX/MD.
- Common pitfalls: icons or two‑column layouts → convert to text; verify dates.
Alternatives
- Canva — best for design‑heavy resumes (watch ATS parsing).
- Jobscan — focused ATS keyword checking (pair with a builder).
- Rezi / Teal — strong keywording and role targeting alongside vitae‐style workflows.
- ResumeGenius / Enhancv / Kickresume — more templates, varying ATS results.
FAQ
- Pricing? $1/mo (1 profile) or $3/mo (5 profiles). Free for first 20 users.
- Cancel anytime? Yes.
- ATS‑safe? Yes—single‑column, semantic headings, clean bullets.
- Non‑native support? Yes—tone and clarity helpers.
- Exports? PDF, DOCX, MD.
- Time to generate? Typically minutes per JD.
- Data privacy? Documents remain your content; export any time.
Sources
- Pricing disclosures on competitor sites (verify current plan terms)
- Aggregated user feedback from mainstream review forums (cancellation/paywall themes)
- University career centers’ guidance on ATS formatting
Final verdict
If you want fast JD‑specific tweaks and ATS‑safe formatting at transparent pricing, choose Vitae. If you want more visual templates and don’t mind subscriptions or manual editing, Zety can still work.
Try Vitae (MVP) — Free for first 20 users · $1/mo (1) · $3/mo (5) · Cancel anytime
title: Zety vs Vitae — Pricing, ATS Results, and Speed (2025) description: "Compare Zety vs Vitae. ATS-first resumes, JD-tailoring in minutes, and micro-pricing: $1/mo (1) or $3/mo (5). Free for first 20 users." slug: compare/zety-vs-vitae date: 2025-09-18 author: Vitae Editorial — Resume & ATS Specialists og_title: Zety vs Vitae og_description: ATS-first resumes at $1/$3 vs subscription fatigue. twitter_card: summary_large_image
Zety vs Vitae
TL;DR
If you’re tired of $20/mo resume subscriptions, Vitae is a micro-priced, ATS-first alternative: $1/mo for 1 profile or $3/mo for 5. Users often report Zety’s templates are polished but can be heavy and not ATS-optimized by default. Vitae focuses on JD-tailoring in minutes, clean parsing, and export-ready formats. It’s currently free for the first 20 users.
Table of Contents
- Overview
- Feature Comparison
- What people dislike about Zety
- How Vitae solves it
- FAQ
- CTA
Overview
Vitae is built around ATS-first structure and lightning-fast job-description tailoring. No paywall creep, no upsells.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Zety | Vitae |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ~$20+/mo subs | $1/mo (1) · $3/mo (5) |
| ATS-first formatting | Partial | Yes, default |
| JD-tailoring | Manual-heavy | Guided, in minutes |
| Export (PDF/DOCX/MD) | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-profile | Limited | 1 or 5 with micro-pricing |
| Non-native English support | General | Helpers + tone-polish |
What people dislike about Zety
- Subscription fatigue and upsells
- Pretty templates that may not be ATS-friendly
- Manual tailoring takes time
- Paywalls mid-flow
How Vitae solves it
- ATS-first structure out of the box
- JD-tailoring flow designed for minutes, not hours
- Transparent pricing: $1/$3; free for first 20 users
- Clean exports that parse reliably
[Screenshots here]
Internal Links
- See pricing: /pricing
- FAQs: /faq
- More comparisons: /compare/novoresume-vs-vitae, /compare/canva-vs-vitae
FAQ
- Is Vitae compatible with ATS? Yes—structure is ATS-first by default.
- Can I tailor per JD quickly? Yes, in minutes with guided inputs.
- Do you support cover letters? Yes, generated alongside the resume.
- What about price? $1/mo for 1 profile; $3/mo for 5.
- Is there a free trial? Free for the first 20 users.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "FAQPage",
"mainEntity": [
{"@type": "Question","name": "Is Vitae compatible with ATS?","acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer","text": "Yes, ATS-first by default."}},
{"@type": "Question","name": "How fast can I tailor per JD?","acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer","text": "In minutes via guided inputs."}},
{"@type": "Question","name": "Do you support cover letters?","acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer","text": "Yes, resume + cover letter flows."}},
{"@type": "Question","name": "What is the price?","acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer","text": "$1/mo (1), $3/mo (5)."}},
{"@type": "Question","name": "Is there a free trial?","acceptedAnswer": {"@type": "Answer","text": "Free for first 20 users."}}
]
}
CTA
Try Vitae (MVP) — $1/mo (1 profile) · $3/mo (5 profiles). Free for the first 20 users. Cancel anytime.
—
Author: Vitae Editorial — Resume & ATS Specialists